I finished some of the paperwork needed for a patient discharge tomorrow, so I will be following up with a discharge counsel the following day.
Today is our clinic day and I was able to follow up with one of the patients that I had first met in week 1. I interviewed him for both the safety ( i.e. diarrhea, rash, PICC complications,etc) and efficacy (i.e. fever and chills) of his therapy. I had first met this patient when I was doing a home IV entry assessment, which was followed by a discharge counseling session. The patient was doing well on therapy. His only concern was that it was bothersome to carry around a pump and bag for the last two weeks. He claims that it is contributing to his neck pain, which is complicated with a hx of spondylosis. Fortunately, Mandeep was able to come up with a compromise where the patient would be switched to once a day ceftriaxone ( 30 min by gravity at the nursing clinic). The patient was very satisfy with this alternative. I was impressed by how Mandeep had thought of this alternative and I feel at fault that I had not tried to solve this problem for the patient before hand.
FMI: Cephalosporin Didactics :
1st gen:
– most gram +ve and some gram -ve: PECK ( Proteus, e. coli, citrobacter, klebsiella)
– 1st and 2nd gen are not effective against pseudomonas a.
– effective for cellulitis, surgical prophylaxis, URTI
2nd gen:
– gram +ve and effective against gram-ve: HEN PECK ( H. influenza, enterobacter, N. meningitis….)
– better against strep pneumonia than 1st gen
– less effective against MSSA than 1st gen
– better against lower respiratory track infection ( community pneumonia) than 1st gen
– cefoxitin is effective for B. fragilis
3rd gen:
– ceftazidime is the only 3rd gen that is effective against pseudomonas
– not effective against B. fragilis
- strep pneumoniae is generally resistant to penicillin
- all cephalosporins are cleared renally, the only exception is ceftriaxone, which is cleared hepatically
- cross sensitivity with penicillin is less than 2%
Academic 1/2 day today:
This afternoon, I saw a ppt that outlined how technician regulation will be enforced in 2010. In one slide, there was a flowchart showing how current techs will have to take an evaluation test, followed by an entry to practice test before getting officially licenced. In the future, we will be having pharmacy assistants ( those who didn’t go through a certified program ) and pharmacy technicians ( those who did go through a certified program). It is uncertain as of yet how their job description at the hospital will differ.
This reminds me of how the entry pharm D in the future may force our current Bachelor pharm to undergo another evaluation test, followed by an entry to practice exam. I can relat to how the older techs must feel…it must be stressful times.
PROJECT
I met up with Karen today, one of the co-investigators for the project. We were able to clarify some of the comments that had been noted on the protocol draft. It looks like we will be doing some final revisions to fine-polish the protocol this week. Our goal is to have the protocol finish by next week, but we will likely need assistance for the statistical analysis portion. Ethics still need to be submitted…..and the site approval form is still in the works…..( not looking forward to this)